Source: Dialogue Works youtube
Showing posts with label EU. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EU. Show all posts
Andrei Martyanov | Russia FIRES BACK at Trump: The War Escalates! | May 28, 2025
Source: Dialogue Works youtube
An excellent conversation with Andrei, who demonstrated impressive knowledge and expertise. However, I wonder if people in the West can fully appreciate the depth of his insights.
An excellent conversation with Andrei, who demonstrated impressive knowledge and expertise. However, I wonder if people in the West can fully appreciate the depth of his insights.
Prof. Ted Postol | Terrifying Cost of Trump's Space Missile Defense: Bankrupt USA, Provoke World War? | May 28, 2025
Larry C. Johnson | Trump Drops Bombshell: Russia's Downfall - Israel Losing, Iran CRUSHES Any Attack | May 26, 2025
Col. Jacques Boud | Europe on the Brink: Is the EU Destroying Itself? | May 19, 2025
Source: Dialogue Woks youtube
Key Takeaways
Main Arguments
- Western Hostility Perception: Russian polls show rising hostility from France, UK, and Germany, driven by aggressive Western rhetoric.
- US Policy Shift: Under Trump (2025), US hostility perception in Russia dropped from 76% (2022) to 27%, due to openness to dialogue.
- European Mismanagement: Decades of globalist policies have weakened Europe economically and socially, outsourcing production and importing cheap labor.
- Colonialist Legacy: The West’s exploitative approach to Africa and the Middle East has fueled immigration and distrust, unlike China’s developmental model.
- Leadership Failure: European leaders lack experience and strategic vision, focusing on foreign policy to dodge domestic failures.
- Censorship Surge: France and Germany impose heavy censorship, stifling dissent and objective reporting on Russia and other issues.
- Iran’s Resilience: Despite sanctions, Iran developed advanced military and nuclear capabilities, highlighting Western policy failures.
- Terrorism’s Roots: Western interventions in the Middle East created conditions for terrorism, not deliberate plots but misguided strategies.
- Economic Decline: The West lost its design and production edge to China, India, and others, becoming less competitive globally.
- Immigration Crisis: Destabilizing countries like Syria and Afghanistan has driven immigration to Europe, straining social cohesion.
Crucial Statistics and Data
- Russian Polls (2014–2025): Hostility perception rose for France (3% to 48%), UK, and Germany; US dropped from 73% (2014) to 27% (2025).
- Macron’s Speech (March 5, 2025): Claimed Russia threatens France, boosting military recruitment.
- Iran’s Nuclear Program: Project Ahmad (early 2000s) studied nuclear feasibility, canceled in 2003, per CIA (2007) and DNI (2025).
- South American Trade (2000–2023): China replaced the US as the main trade partner for most South American countries.
- French Unemployment: Millions jobless due to outsourcing to cheaper North African labor since the 1980s.
- Cold War Censorship: Less severe than today; Soviet papers like Pravda were sold openly in Western Europe.
- Immigration Sources: Afghanistan, Syria, and Ukraine are primary sources of European immigration, linked to Western destabilization.
- French-Russian Cultural Ties: Words like “bistro” (from Russian “bystro”) reflect centuries of cultural exchange.
- Poutine Incidents: French restaurants serving Canadian poutine were attacked (e.g., Molotov cocktails) due to anti-Russian sentiment.
- German Censorship: Intelligence services label pro-Russian books in libraries, echoing WWII-era censorship.
Actionable Insights
- Support Alternative Media: Seek objective information from non-mainstream sources to counter Western disinformation.
- Advocate for Development Policies: Push for Europe to invest in African/Middle Eastern infrastructure to reduce immigration.
- Demand Transparency: Call for reduced censorship and honest reporting on Russia and global conflicts.
- Engage in Dialogue: Encourage leaders to prioritize diplomacy with Russia and Iran to de-escalate tensions.
- Promote Local Production: Support policies to bring manufacturing back to Europe, reducing reliance on global outsourcing.
- Challenge Globalist Narratives: Question capitalist and Marxist globalist policies that exploit developing nations.
- Educate on History: Highlight France-Russia cultural ties to counter anti-Russian propaganda.
- Monitor Leadership: Vote for experienced, strategic leaders, not career politicians with limited real-world experience.
- Resist Censorship: Protest against government overreach in media and literature, especially in France and Germany.
- Learn from China’s Model: Study China’s non-interventionist, infrastructure-focused approach to global partnerships.
Key Observations and Claims
- Russian Rhetoric: More measured than Ukraine’s, reflecting diplomatic restraint despite war.
- Ukrainian Divide: Western Ukraine (Germanic, anti-Slav) contrasts with pro-Russian eastern/southern regions.
- French Propaganda: Macron’s 2025 speech fueled fear of Russian invasion, driving military enrollment.
- Failed Sanctions: Western sanctions on Russia collapsed, prompting harsher anti-Russian rhetoric in 2025.
- French-Russian History: Centuries of friendship (e.g., WWII pilots, 1917 immigrants) contrast with current hostility.
- Cultural Exchange: French words in Russian and vice versa show deep historical ties.
- Poutine Misunderstanding: Canadian dish mistaken for Russian, leading to violent attacks in France.
- Media Bias: French mainstream media avoids pro-Russian facts, unlike some US outlets (e.g., NYT, WaPo).
- Censorship in France: Journalists told not to report truth if it supports Putin, per editor directives.
- German Libraries: Intelligence services flag pro-Russian books, akin to Nazi-era censorship.
- Cold War Confidence: The West’s belief in its system negated censorship needs, unlike today’s insecurity.
- Globalist Outsourcing: Western production moved to China, India, and Southeast Asia for cost savings.
- Cheap Labor Import: France replaced local workers with North Africans, sparking unemployment.
- Communist Opposition: French Communist Party opposed 1980s immigration, citing worker displacement.
- Capitalist Globalism: Both leftist and capitalist globalists exploited cheap labor globally.
- China’s Rise: China, India, and others now innovate and produce, surpassing Western capabilities.
- Western Decline: The West no longer designs key products (e.g., cars, cameras), losing global edge.
- Immigration Impact: Imported labor created second-class citizens and social imbalances in Europe.
- China’s Africa Strategy: Builds infrastructure locally, unlike Western outsourcing models.
- French Interference: France’s political meddling led to expulsions from Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso.
- South American Shift: China’s trade dominance in South America reflects Western failures.
- Iran’s Nuclear Origins: Project Ahmad (2000s) responded to US threats, canceled in 2003.
- Iran’s Ingenuity: Built advanced drones ($35–40K) and military systems despite sanctions.
- US Weapons Failure: Billions spent on weapons unfit for Ukraine, unlike Iraq/Afghanistan.
- Terrorism’s Cause: Western wars since 1991 fostered militias and refugee flows.
- Syria’s Potential: Post-Soviet Syria sought EU ties, but Western destabilization split the country.
- Immigration Sources: Destabilized nations (e.g., Syria, Afghanistan) drive European migration.
- Currency Weaponization: Euro and dollar sanctions eroded global trust in Western finance.
- Iran’s Pro-West Leanings: Despite sanctions, Iran’s culture is historically pro-Western.
- Leadership Youth: Young, inexperienced leaders like Macron lack real-world perspective.
- Macron’s Inexperience: Limited banking background, no significant life experience.
- Poor Candidate Pool: French elections (e.g., Macron vs. Le Pen) offer intellectually weak options.
- France’s Decline: Losing global influence due to ineffective leadership and policies.
- European Isolation: Investors avoid Europe due to inconsistent policies and asset seizures.
- Trump’s Insight: Recognizes Western decline but lacks clear solutions.
Philosophical and Ethical Points
- Colonialist Mindset: Western exploitation of labor and resources mirrors historical imperialism.
- Revenge-Driven Policy: US actions against Iran stem from 1979 embassy humiliation, not strategy.
- Lost Trust: Weaponizing currencies and seizing funds eroded global confidence in the West.
- Moral Failure: Destabilizing nations for control created terrorism and migration, not progress.
- Leadership Void: Europe’s immature leaders prioritize short-term optics over long-term strategy.
- Cultural Betrayal: France’s anti-Russian shift betrays centuries of cultural friendship.
- Societal Imbalance: Importing cheap labor eroded middle-class stability in Europe.
- Harmonious Relations: Dialogue and trade, not war, foster global stability.
- Disinformation Harm: Organized censorship distorts public understanding, weakening democracy.
- Development Ethics: Empowering nations to produce locally is more sustainable than exploitation.
Critiques and Skepticism
- Western Arrogance: Assumed superiority led to outsourcing and loss of production capacity.
- Media Dishonesty: French media’s anti-Russian bias suppresses truth, unlike selective US reporting.
- Censorship Excess: German book labeling and French media controls echo authoritarian tactics.
- Strategic Myopia: Europe’s focus on foreign policy ignores domestic economic and social crises.
- Globalist Flaws: Both capitalist and leftist globalism prioritized profit over societal health.
- Iran Misjudgment: Western narrative ignores Iran’s pro-West culture and ingenuity.
- War Inefficiency: US weapons failed in Ukraine, wasting billions on outdated designs.
- Immigration Oversight: Europe ignored destabilization’s role in migration surges.
- Leadership Incompetence: Young leaders lack the depth to navigate complex global challenges.
- Policy Inertia: Europe lags behind Trump in recognizing global economic shifts.
Summary Notes
- Main Thesis: Europe’s decline stems from mismanaged globalist policies, aggressive anti-Russian rhetoric, and weak leadership, fostering censorship, immigration crises, and economic isolation.
- Actionable Insights: Support alternative media, advocate for development-focused foreign policies, and demand experienced leaders to restore trust and stability.
- Crucial Statistics: Russian hostility perception rose (France: 3% to 48%); US dropped to 27% (2025); China dominates South American trade.
Col. Doug Magregor | It's UKRAINE Prolonging this WAR | Apr. 28, 2025
Source: Daniel Davis / Deep Dive youtube
Description:
Russia announced a new temporary ceasefire, its second recently, to coincide with important historical events (Easter and the end of WWII, which is deeply significant in Russia and Ukraine).
Colonel Douglas Macgregor interprets this as Putin sending a message: he's willing to work toward peace, particularly with Trump if possible, but cannot allow Ukraine to rearm.
Macgregor criticizes Trump’s suggestion that Putin doesn’t want peace, calling it incorrect.
He suggests Trump could reciprocate by recognizing Soviet sacrifices in WWII as a gesture to Russia.
Ukraine (Zelensky) rejected the ceasefire proposal, calling it a manipulation and demanding an immediate, unconditional 30-day ceasefire.
Macgregor believes Zelensky’s refusal could lead to his downfall, hinting that Russia is now prepared for a major offensive that could capture Kyiv.
He argues Western leaders and media misunderstand or ignore Russian intentions, driven by globalist elites in Berlin, Paris, and London, disconnected from ground realities.
There's rising military dissent in France over the idea of fighting in Ukraine.
Macgregor criticizes the U.S. and Europe for prolonging the war by supporting Ukraine, suggesting it only leads to more death and devastation.
Some U.S. officials (both Democrat and Republican) are still calling for harsher measures against Russia, reflecting a deep misunderstanding of the situation according to Macgregor.
Macgregor rejects claims that Putin has reneged on promises, saying Putin has consistently shown willingness to negotiate and has acted with restraint to minimize casualties.
He concludes that Russia’s patience is running out and a decisive military action may soon end the war, especially if Western support falters.
Description:
Russia announced a new temporary ceasefire, its second recently, to coincide with important historical events (Easter and the end of WWII, which is deeply significant in Russia and Ukraine).
Colonel Douglas Macgregor interprets this as Putin sending a message: he's willing to work toward peace, particularly with Trump if possible, but cannot allow Ukraine to rearm.
Macgregor criticizes Trump’s suggestion that Putin doesn’t want peace, calling it incorrect.
He suggests Trump could reciprocate by recognizing Soviet sacrifices in WWII as a gesture to Russia.
Ukraine (Zelensky) rejected the ceasefire proposal, calling it a manipulation and demanding an immediate, unconditional 30-day ceasefire.
Macgregor believes Zelensky’s refusal could lead to his downfall, hinting that Russia is now prepared for a major offensive that could capture Kyiv.
He argues Western leaders and media misunderstand or ignore Russian intentions, driven by globalist elites in Berlin, Paris, and London, disconnected from ground realities.
There's rising military dissent in France over the idea of fighting in Ukraine.
Macgregor criticizes the U.S. and Europe for prolonging the war by supporting Ukraine, suggesting it only leads to more death and devastation.
Some U.S. officials (both Democrat and Republican) are still calling for harsher measures against Russia, reflecting a deep misunderstanding of the situation according to Macgregor.
Macgregor rejects claims that Putin has reneged on promises, saying Putin has consistently shown willingness to negotiate and has acted with restraint to minimize casualties.
He concludes that Russia’s patience is running out and a decisive military action may soon end the war, especially if Western support falters.
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s interview to the US bloggers Mario Naufal, Larri Johnson and Andrew Napolitano (Moscow, March 12, 2025)
Source: mid.ru
Full Transcript
Key talking points:
• I think what is going on in the United States is a return to normalcy. <...> The fact is that a normal administration without any, you know, unchristian ideas came to power and the reaction was such an explosion in the media, in the politics all over the world is very interesting and very telling.
• When we met in Riyadh with Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz and Steve Witkoff they suggested the meeting and they said, look, we want normal relations in the sense that the foundation of the American foreign policy under the Donald Trump administration is the national interest of the United States. But at the same time, we understand that other countries also have their national interest.
• It is very well understood that countries like the United States and Russia would never have their national interest the same. They would not coincide maybe even 50 or less percent. But when they do coincide this situation must be used to develop this simultaneous and similar interest. But when the interests do not coincide and contradict each other then the responsible countries must do everything not to allow this contradiction to degenerate into confrontation, especially military confrontation which would be disastrous for many other countries.
• The beginning of the special military operation was a decision because all other attempts, all other alternatives to bring things into some positive dimension failed for ten years after the illegal coup in Kiev, in violation of the deal signed the night before and guaranteed by the Germans, French and Poles.
• I don't think the Americans would drop from NATO. At least President Trump never hinted that this might be the case. But what he did bluntly say was that if you want us to protect you, to give you security guarantees, you pay what is necessary.
• But President Trump doesn't want to provide these security guarantees to Ukraine under Zelensky. He has his own view of the situation which he bluntly presents every now and then, that this war should never have started – that pulling Ukraine into NATO in violation of its Constitution, in violation of the Declaration of Independence of 1991, on the basis of which we recognized Ukraine as a sovereign state. For several reasons including that this Declaration was saying no NATO, no blocs, neutral status. Another thing which this Declaration also confirmed and solidified - all rights of Russian and all other national minorities are to be respected.
• Europe and the UK they certainly want this to continue. The way they received Zelensky in London after the scandal in Washington, it's an indication that they want to raise the stakes and they are preparing something to pressure the Donald Trump administration back into some aggressive action against Russia.
• It's not about the territories, it's about the people who were deprived of their history by law. Territories are important only because people live on these territories. The people who live on the territories are descendants of those who for hundreds of years were building Odessa & other cities on those very lands who were building ports, roads, who were founding those lands and who associated with the history of this land.
❗️ The Americans know that we would not betray our commitments, legal commitments, the political commitments which we develop with China.
Full Transcript
Key talking points:
• I think what is going on in the United States is a return to normalcy. <...> The fact is that a normal administration without any, you know, unchristian ideas came to power and the reaction was such an explosion in the media, in the politics all over the world is very interesting and very telling.
• When we met in Riyadh with Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz and Steve Witkoff they suggested the meeting and they said, look, we want normal relations in the sense that the foundation of the American foreign policy under the Donald Trump administration is the national interest of the United States. But at the same time, we understand that other countries also have their national interest.
• It is very well understood that countries like the United States and Russia would never have their national interest the same. They would not coincide maybe even 50 or less percent. But when they do coincide this situation must be used to develop this simultaneous and similar interest. But when the interests do not coincide and contradict each other then the responsible countries must do everything not to allow this contradiction to degenerate into confrontation, especially military confrontation which would be disastrous for many other countries.
• The beginning of the special military operation was a decision because all other attempts, all other alternatives to bring things into some positive dimension failed for ten years after the illegal coup in Kiev, in violation of the deal signed the night before and guaranteed by the Germans, French and Poles.
• I don't think the Americans would drop from NATO. At least President Trump never hinted that this might be the case. But what he did bluntly say was that if you want us to protect you, to give you security guarantees, you pay what is necessary.
• But President Trump doesn't want to provide these security guarantees to Ukraine under Zelensky. He has his own view of the situation which he bluntly presents every now and then, that this war should never have started – that pulling Ukraine into NATO in violation of its Constitution, in violation of the Declaration of Independence of 1991, on the basis of which we recognized Ukraine as a sovereign state. For several reasons including that this Declaration was saying no NATO, no blocs, neutral status. Another thing which this Declaration also confirmed and solidified - all rights of Russian and all other national minorities are to be respected.
• Europe and the UK they certainly want this to continue. The way they received Zelensky in London after the scandal in Washington, it's an indication that they want to raise the stakes and they are preparing something to pressure the Donald Trump administration back into some aggressive action against Russia.
• It's not about the territories, it's about the people who were deprived of their history by law. Territories are important only because people live on these territories. The people who live on the territories are descendants of those who for hundreds of years were building Odessa & other cities on those very lands who were building ports, roads, who were founding those lands and who associated with the history of this land.
❗️ The Americans know that we would not betray our commitments, legal commitments, the political commitments which we develop with China.
