Source: Judge Napolitano youtube
Showing posts with label EU. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EU. Show all posts
Col. Jacques Baud | How the EU is Trying to Silence Me! | Jan. 8, 2026
Labels
Col. Jacques Baud,
EU
/
Prof. Jiang Xueqin | Predictions for 2026 - Empire, Rivalry & Collapse | Jan. 5, 2026
Labels
China,
EU,
Glenn Diesen,
NATO,
Prof. Jiang Xueqin,
Russia,
Trump,
Ukraine,
Venezuela
/
Source: Glenn Diesen youtube, Predictive History youtube
Description:
Prof. Xueqin Jiang argues that both historical patterns and game theory can be used to accurately predict future events. Prof. Jiang outlines his predictions for 2026: Great power rivalry, economic competition and collapse, civil war etc.
Description:
Prof. Xueqin Jiang argues that both historical patterns and game theory can be used to accurately predict future events. Prof. Jiang outlines his predictions for 2026: Great power rivalry, economic competition and collapse, civil war etc.
Alex Christoforou | US will run Venezuela. Graham reveals plan; take out Iran, Russia, China. EU/UK bows down to Trump | Jan. 4, 2026
Source: Alex Christoforou youtube
Description:
US will run Venezuela. Graham reveals plan; take out Iran, Russia, China. EU/UK bows down to Trump.
Timeline:
0:00 - Introduction and overview of Venezuela situation
1:54 - Discussion on Trump's statements following Maduro capture
3:44 - Analysis of U.S. involvement in Venezuela oil and resources
5:53 - Trump's comments on China and Russia regarding the operation
9:10 - Trump's remarks on Maduro lack of support and future leadership
12:17 - Insight into Delcy Rodriguez role and U.S. plans for Venezuela
14:41 - Warning from Trump to Venezuelan officials about potential consequences
16:08 - Discussion on the CIA's involvement in Venezuela operations
17:46 - Trump's social media post featuring Maduro capture
19:16 - Lindsey Graham comments on U.S. actions and implications for China
23:12 - Overview of international reactions to U.S. intervention in Venezuela
31:11 - European leaders' responses to the legality of U.S. actions
35:04 - Commentary on international law and U.S. intervention policy
39:01 - Protests around the world in response to U.S. actions in Venezuela
40:12 - Conclusion and wrap-up of the video discussion
Description:
US will run Venezuela. Graham reveals plan; take out Iran, Russia, China. EU/UK bows down to Trump.
Timeline:
0:00 - Introduction and overview of Venezuela situation
1:54 - Discussion on Trump's statements following Maduro capture
3:44 - Analysis of U.S. involvement in Venezuela oil and resources
5:53 - Trump's comments on China and Russia regarding the operation
9:10 - Trump's remarks on Maduro lack of support and future leadership
12:17 - Insight into Delcy Rodriguez role and U.S. plans for Venezuela
14:41 - Warning from Trump to Venezuelan officials about potential consequences
16:08 - Discussion on the CIA's involvement in Venezuela operations
17:46 - Trump's social media post featuring Maduro capture
19:16 - Lindsey Graham comments on U.S. actions and implications for China
23:12 - Overview of international reactions to U.S. intervention in Venezuela
31:11 - European leaders' responses to the legality of U.S. actions
35:04 - Commentary on international law and U.S. intervention policy
39:01 - Protests around the world in response to U.S. actions in Venezuela
40:12 - Conclusion and wrap-up of the video discussion
Larry Johnson | U.S. War on Venezuela Has Global Ramifications | Jan. 3, 2026
Labels
EU,
Glenn Diesen,
Larry Johnson,
NATO,
Russia,
Trump,
Ukraine,
Venezuela
/
Source: Glenn Diesen youtube
Description:
Larry Johnson is a former intelligence analyst at the CIA who also worked at the US State Department's Office of Counterterrorism. Johnson discusses how the U.S. attacked Venezuela and abducted President Maduro, and what will be the global consequences.
Description:
Larry Johnson is a former intelligence analyst at the CIA who also worked at the US State Department's Office of Counterterrorism. Johnson discusses how the U.S. attacked Venezuela and abducted President Maduro, and what will be the global consequences.
John Mearsheimer | Iran & Trump Threats Exchanged | Jan. 2, 2026
Source: Daniel Davis youtube
Description:
The discussion examines U.S. strategy toward Iran under President Trump, featuring analysis by Professor John Mearsheimer. Trump’s rhetoric toward Iran is highly aggressive—threatening to “knock them down” if they rebuild nuclear or missile capabilities or repress protesters—but Mearsheimer argues this is largely performative. Trump talks tough and occasionally uses limited military force (e.g., one-off missile strikes) but deliberately avoids large, sustained wars or “forever wars.”
Mearsheimer contends that Trump is heavily influenced by Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu, whose goal is a major confrontation with Iran. While Trump must rhetorically appease Netanyahu and pro-Israel constituencies, he resists full-scale escalation, opting instead for symbolic or low-impact strikes that project toughness without changing realities on the ground.
The conversation also highlights contradictions in U.S. policy: the U.S. publicly claims to seek negotiations with Iran while simultaneously preparing or carrying out military strikes, as seen in June 2025. This pattern, along with past actions such as withdrawing from the JCPOA and undermining negotiations elsewhere, severely damages U.S. credibility. Mearsheimer argues adversaries—and even allies—now assume the U.S. cannot be trusted to honor verbal or written agreements.
From an international law perspective, Mearsheimer says Trump shows little regard for legal norms, citing threats and uses of force with no clear legal authority. Strategically, this behavior reinforces a global perception that U.S. diplomacy is unreliable, pushing states like Russia, Iran, China, and even partners like Ukraine to demand formal, legally binding guarantees rather than relying on U.S. assurances.
Overall, the segment portrays U.S. Iran policy as incoherent: aggressive in language, limited in action, driven by domestic and allied pressures, and corrosive to American credibility and long-term strategic interests.
Description:
The discussion examines U.S. strategy toward Iran under President Trump, featuring analysis by Professor John Mearsheimer. Trump’s rhetoric toward Iran is highly aggressive—threatening to “knock them down” if they rebuild nuclear or missile capabilities or repress protesters—but Mearsheimer argues this is largely performative. Trump talks tough and occasionally uses limited military force (e.g., one-off missile strikes) but deliberately avoids large, sustained wars or “forever wars.”
Mearsheimer contends that Trump is heavily influenced by Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu, whose goal is a major confrontation with Iran. While Trump must rhetorically appease Netanyahu and pro-Israel constituencies, he resists full-scale escalation, opting instead for symbolic or low-impact strikes that project toughness without changing realities on the ground.
The conversation also highlights contradictions in U.S. policy: the U.S. publicly claims to seek negotiations with Iran while simultaneously preparing or carrying out military strikes, as seen in June 2025. This pattern, along with past actions such as withdrawing from the JCPOA and undermining negotiations elsewhere, severely damages U.S. credibility. Mearsheimer argues adversaries—and even allies—now assume the U.S. cannot be trusted to honor verbal or written agreements.
From an international law perspective, Mearsheimer says Trump shows little regard for legal norms, citing threats and uses of force with no clear legal authority. Strategically, this behavior reinforces a global perception that U.S. diplomacy is unreliable, pushing states like Russia, Iran, China, and even partners like Ukraine to demand formal, legally binding guarantees rather than relying on U.S. assurances.
Overall, the segment portrays U.S. Iran policy as incoherent: aggressive in language, limited in action, driven by domestic and allied pressures, and corrosive to American credibility and long-term strategic interests.
Andrei Martyanov | Target--civilians | Jan. 1, 2026
Labels
Andrei Martyanov,
EU,
NATO,
Russia,
Ukraine
/
Source: smoothiex12.blogspot.com
Description:
Last (or first) resort--terrorism. West's stupefying military-intel incompetence.
Description:
Last (or first) resort--terrorism. West's stupefying military-intel incompetence.
Scott Ritter & Ray McGovern | Russia's Retaliation Triggers Europe's APOCALYPSE, NATO Can't Survive This! | Jan. 1, 2026
Labels
EU,
NATO,
Ray McGovern,
Russia,
Scott Ritter,
Trump,
Ukraine
/
Source: Danny Haiphong youtube
Description:
Russia's devastating retaliation has triggered Europe in a major way, and NATO's threats won't save it says Scott Ritter, the prolific former UN Weapons inspector and marine corps intelligence officer. Ray McGovern also joined for a critical update on the bleak future of the West amid Ukraine's collapse.
Description:
Russia's devastating retaliation has triggered Europe in a major way, and NATO's threats won't save it says Scott Ritter, the prolific former UN Weapons inspector and marine corps intelligence officer. Ray McGovern also joined for a critical update on the bleak future of the West amid Ukraine's collapse.
Scott Ritter | Best of Marathon [PART ONE & TWO] | Dec. 31, 2026
Source: Judge Napolitano YouTube
- The Russia–Ukraine war and NATO escalation
- U.S. foreign policy and military overreach
- Intelligence failures and media narratives
- Nuclear risk, deterrence, and global power shifts
These conversations—originally aired on Judging Freedom—have drawn millions of views for their unfiltered critique of Washington, the Pentagon, and America’s role in global conflict.
This marathon brings together essential moments, long-form analysis, and uninterrupted discussions for viewers who want deeper context beyond the headlines.
Part 2
- The strategic endgame in Ukraine
- U.S.–Russia relations and global realignment
- The limits of American military power
- Propaganda, censorship, and public perception
- The risks of escalation toward direct superpower conflict
Description:
In this extended compilation, Ritter analyzes:
- The Russia–Ukraine war and NATO escalation
- U.S. foreign policy and military overreach
- Intelligence failures and media narratives
- Nuclear risk, deterrence, and global power shifts
These conversations—originally aired on Judging Freedom—have drawn millions of views for their unfiltered critique of Washington, the Pentagon, and America’s role in global conflict.
This marathon brings together essential moments, long-form analysis, and uninterrupted discussions for viewers who want deeper context beyond the headlines.
Part 2
Description:
PART 2 of Judging Freedom’s 8-hour “Best of Scott Ritter” marathon, continuing Judge Andrew Napolitano’s most compelling interviews with the former UN weapons inspector.
In this segment, Ritter expands on:
- The strategic endgame in Ukraine
- U.S.–Russia relations and global realignment
- The limits of American military power
- Propaganda, censorship, and public perception
- The risks of escalation toward direct superpower conflict
Alex Christoforou | Russia claims drones target Putin home. Trump shocked. Zelensky needs US to win. Saudi-UAE conflict | Dec. 30, 2025
Labels
Alex Christoforou,
EU,
NATO,
Russia,
Trump,
Ukraine,
Vladimir Putin
/
Stanislav Krapivnik | Massive Escalation - Attack on Putin's Residence | Dec. 30, 2025
Labels
EU,
Glenn Diesen,
NATO,
Russia,
Stanislav Krapivnik,
Ukraine,
Vladimir Putin
/
Andrei Martyanov & Lt Col Daniel Davis | Russia to Ukraine: "Withdraw from the Donbas" | Dec. 29, 2025
Labels
Andrei Martyanov,
EU,
Lt Col Daniel Davis,
NATO,
Russia,
Trump,
Ukraine
/
Col. Jacques Baud | Is the West Finally Waking Up? | Dec. 29, 2025
Labels
Col. Jacques Baud,
EU,
NATO,
Russia,
Ukraine
/
90 Billion Later: What Is Europe Really Buying? | Explained by Pepe Escobar | Dec. 26, 2025
Labels
EU,
NATO,
Pepe Escobar,
Ukraine
/
Source: Thinkers Forum youtube
Description:
The EU's €90 billion loan to Ukraine is essentially a scheme to prolong a war Europe has already lost—one that squeezes European taxpayers while lining banks' pockets, as lenders jump at the chance to collect interest. In this episode, geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar delivers a sharp deep dive into one of the 21st century’s craziest schemes.
Description:
The EU's €90 billion loan to Ukraine is essentially a scheme to prolong a war Europe has already lost—one that squeezes European taxpayers while lining banks' pockets, as lenders jump at the chance to collect interest. In this episode, geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar delivers a sharp deep dive into one of the 21st century’s craziest schemes.
Filmed on December 22, 2025, this is the first installment of our exclusive interview series.
Larry C. Johnson & Col. Larry Wilkerson | Colossal Shifts Rock the Middle East & Europe | Dec. 27, 2025
Labels
China,
Col. Larry Wilkerson,
EU,
Iran,
Larry Johnson,
NATO,
Russia,
Ukraine
/
Andrei Martyanov | Under 30 Pounds "Threat" | Dec. 22, 2025
Labels
Andrei Martyanov,
EU,
NATO,
Russia,
Ukraine
/
Source: smoothiex12.blogspot.com
Description:
Assassination, embarrassing article, and embarrassing Dark Eagle.
Description:
Assassination, embarrassing article, and embarrassing Dark Eagle.
