Source: The Duran youtube
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel. Show all posts
Larry C. Johnson & Col. Larry Wilkerson | Iran Warns U.S. in Urgent Letter to UN Vowing to WIPE OUT | Feb. 20, 2026
Labels
China,
Col. Larry Wilkerson,
Iran,
Israel,
Larry C. Johnson,
Russia,
Trump
/
John Kiriakou | "Ukraine Should Provide Opportunities", Epstein, Deaths, & More... | Feb. 19, 2026
Labels
China,
Israel,
Jeffrey Epstein,
John Kiriakou,
Russia,
Ukraine
/
Larry C. Johnson | The US Information Operation in Iran - Trump’s Presidency Hangs by a Thread | Feb. 19, 2026
Labels
China,
Garland Nixon,
Iran,
Israel,
Larry C. Johnson,
Russia,
Trump
/
Whitney Webb | Redacted | Prince Andrew Arrested, Israel Controlled Epstein’s Security | Feb. 19, 2026
Labels
Bill Clinton,
Bill Gates,
Hillary Clinton,
Israel,
Jeffrey Epstein,
Whitney Webb
/
Andrei Martyanov | IRAN BOMBSHELL: Hypersonic Missile Could Sink US Navy Carrier — Trump WARNED! | Feb. 19, 2026
Alex Christoforou | Andrew arrest. WSJ, Trump shock & awe Iran. Orban/Fico hit back. EU presents Russia surrender list | Feb. 19, 2026
Labels
Alex Christoforou,
EU,
Iran,
Israel,
Jeffrey Epstein,
Russia,
Trump
/
Alastair Crooke | War Closer Than Ever, Iran's GAME CHANGING Retaliation Boxes Trump In | Feb. 19, 2026
Labels
Alastair Crooke,
China,
Danny Haiphong,
Iran,
Israel,
Russia,
Trump
/
Richard D. Wolff & Michael Hudson | Oil Prices About to Surge? Persian Gulf & Red Sea Threat | Feb. 19, 2026
Labels
China,
Iran,
Israel,
Michael Hudson,
Richard D. Wolff,
Russia,
Trump
/
Source: Dialogue Works YouTube
Alex Krainer | Iran Moves on Hormuz & Bab el-Mandeb, US “All In” With F35s, Major War Brewing | Feb. 19, 2026
Alex Christoforou | Macron free speech BS. Zelensky demands to meet Putin. UK sabotage Geneva talks. Iran war nears | Feb. 18, 2026
Scott Ritter | Hormuz Blocked! Iran’s Missile Fire Can Leave the US Navy DEFENSELESS | Feb. 18, 2026
Col. Douglas Macgregor | BOMBING IRAN Won't Fix Anything | Feb. 17, 2026
Labels
China,
Colonel Douglas Macgregor,
Iran,
Israel,
Lt Col Daniel Davis,
Russia,
Trump,
Ukraine
/
Source: Daniel Davis youtube
Description:
U.S. military leaders are confident in their capabilities against Iran, but any war would likely involve American losses in the air, on the ground, and possibly at sea.
Senator Lindsey Graham is portrayed as accepting those risks, arguing military action is justified despite potential U.S. casualties. The speaker strongly disagrees, arguing there is no compelling U.S. national security reason to attack Iran and that such a war would provoke Iranian retaliation and American deaths.
Col Douglas Macgregor claims some policymakers and commentators view U.S. and Israeli interests as identical, but argues the U.S. has no strategic interest in destroying Iran or its society.
He rejects the idea that Iranians would welcome U.S. military intervention, arguing bombing Iran would not help its population or lead to regime change.
The speaker disputes claims that Iran poses a global threat or is actively pursuing nuclear weapons, arguing Iran’s actions are primarily defensive or regional rather than aimed at world domination.
He criticizes Western media and neoconservative voices, including Mark Thiessen, for promoting war and framing negotiations as requiring Iran’s surrender.
He argues negotiations are unlikely to succeed because U.S. demands—such as ending enrichment, missile programs, and regional influence—are unacceptable to Iran.
He concludes that U.S. policy toward Iran is heavily influenced by Israeli strategic priorities and broader geopolitical and financial power struggles, making compromise unlikely and increasing the risk of conflict.
Overall: The speaker argues that war with Iran would be costly, unnecessary for U.S. security, unlikely to achieve its goals, and driven more by ideology and alliances than by clear American interests.
Description:
U.S. military leaders are confident in their capabilities against Iran, but any war would likely involve American losses in the air, on the ground, and possibly at sea.
Senator Lindsey Graham is portrayed as accepting those risks, arguing military action is justified despite potential U.S. casualties. The speaker strongly disagrees, arguing there is no compelling U.S. national security reason to attack Iran and that such a war would provoke Iranian retaliation and American deaths.
Col Douglas Macgregor claims some policymakers and commentators view U.S. and Israeli interests as identical, but argues the U.S. has no strategic interest in destroying Iran or its society.
He rejects the idea that Iranians would welcome U.S. military intervention, arguing bombing Iran would not help its population or lead to regime change.
The speaker disputes claims that Iran poses a global threat or is actively pursuing nuclear weapons, arguing Iran’s actions are primarily defensive or regional rather than aimed at world domination.
He criticizes Western media and neoconservative voices, including Mark Thiessen, for promoting war and framing negotiations as requiring Iran’s surrender.
He argues negotiations are unlikely to succeed because U.S. demands—such as ending enrichment, missile programs, and regional influence—are unacceptable to Iran.
He concludes that U.S. policy toward Iran is heavily influenced by Israeli strategic priorities and broader geopolitical and financial power struggles, making compromise unlikely and increasing the risk of conflict.
Overall: The speaker argues that war with Iran would be costly, unnecessary for U.S. security, unlikely to achieve its goals, and driven more by ideology and alliances than by clear American interests.
Mohammad Marandi | Iran JUST Closed the Strait of Hormuz - Wiped Out: Iran Plans to Sink the US Navy | Feb. 17, 2026
Chas Freeman | U.S. Restoring Empire & War On Eurasia | Feb. 17, 2026
Labels
Chas Freeman,
China,
Glenn Diesen,
Iran,
Israel,
Russia,
Trump
/
Source: Glenn Diesen youtube
Description:
Ambassador Chas Freeman discusses the US efforts to restore the empire and how the Middle East is being reorganised.
Ambassador Freeman was a former Assistant Secretary of Defense, earning the highest public service awards of the Department of Defense for his roles in designing a NATO-centered post-Cold War European security system and in reestablishing defense and military relations with China. He served as U. S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (during operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm). He was Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs during the historic U.S. mediation of Namibian independence from South Africa and Cuban troop withdrawal from Angola.
Description:
Ambassador Chas Freeman discusses the US efforts to restore the empire and how the Middle East is being reorganised.
Ambassador Freeman was a former Assistant Secretary of Defense, earning the highest public service awards of the Department of Defense for his roles in designing a NATO-centered post-Cold War European security system and in reestablishing defense and military relations with China. He served as U. S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (during operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm). He was Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs during the historic U.S. mediation of Namibian independence from South Africa and Cuban troop withdrawal from Angola.
