Description:
In this interview, you’ll be hearing from a whistleblower who served within the Department of Defense.
His voice has been altered and his face blurred to protect his identity. I know some of you might immediately think, “This is just another ‘trust me bro’ situation.” And I get that—it’s healthy to approach things critically. But here’s the reality:
This individual has shown immense courage in coming forward to share what he knows, despite the risks to his career and personal life.
He has been vetted—not just by me, but by others I trust. We’ve had extensive conversations, done our due diligence, and we’re confident that what he’s saying is worth listening to.
While he hasn’t yet provided physical evidence that can be made public, the information he offers contributes to a growing picture that many of us are trying to piece together.
He has been vetted—not just by me, but by others I trust. We’ve had extensive conversations, done our due diligence, and we’re confident that what he’s saying is worth listening to.
While he hasn’t yet provided physical evidence that can be made public, the information he offers contributes to a growing picture that many of us are trying to piece together.
You can take this for what it is. Believe it, question it, scrutinize it—just do it with respect. We’re not claiming to have all the answers. We’re just trying our hardest to ask the right questions and give people a platform to speak.
---
50 Key Takeaways from "Insider Speaks Out - Whistleblower Ben"
• Whistleblower Identity: Ben, speaking anonymously for personal and family safety, is a former active-duty military member and contractor who worked with the U.S. government.
• Purpose of Speaking Out: Ben aims to support fellow whistleblowers like Lou Elizondo, David Grusch, and others, emphasizing the importance of their disclosures.
• UAP Exposure: Ben encountered UAP information both personally (through a sighting) and professionally while serving and as a contractor.
• Security Clearance: Ben held a security clearance, though he avoids specifying the level for operational and personal security reasons.
• Access to UAP Data: His clearance allowed access to systems containing UAP-related information, including videos and data.
• Incidental Involvement: Ben was not directly involved in UAP programs but came across information incidentally and networked with those connected to such programs.
• Personal Sighting: Ben witnessed a medium-sized, disc-shaped or oblate spheroid object, which he describes as silent with no visible wings or propulsion systems.
• Supporting Disclosure: Ben sees his role as part of a team effort to push for UAP disclosure, calling it the "biggest story of our time."
• Historical Context: He references UAP concealment efforts dating back to the Cold War and earlier, possibly 92 years (since 1933).
• Government Secrecy: Ben alleges a persistent government effort to hide UAP evidence, citing fears of anarchy, market shock, or religious upheaval.
• Video Evidence: Ben has seen high-definition (4K or better) UAP videos, including daytime footage and FLIR (Forward-Looking Infrared) recordings.
• Transmedium Capabilities: He describes UAPs operating seamlessly in air and water, beyond the capabilities of commercial drones.
• Orbs and Craft: Ben has seen videos of orbs emerging from water and clustering, as well as larger craft, suggesting non-human intelligence (NHI).
• Non-Threatening Nature: Ben does not view UAPs as a threat but as an ongoing intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operation, possibly for millennia.
• Classified Networks: He accessed UAP videos on classified networks months before their public release by the New York Times in December 2017.
• Validation of Evidence: Ben confirms the authenticity of New York Times UAP videos, noting the government’s lack of understanding of their origin.
• Networking: He has connected with researchers, witnesses, and individuals linked to UAP programs, including someone mentioned in Ross Coulthart’s book.
• Congressional Briefing: Ben has briefed members of Congress on UAP information, fulfilling what he sees as a civic duty.
• Pentagon Obstruction: He accuses the Pentagon of stonewalling Congress, even the Gang of Eight, on UAP matters, undermining democratic oversight.
• Legacy Programs: Ben references a legacy UAP program, alleging Sean Kirkpatrick, former AARO director, was involved despite legal mandates to remain independent.
• Overclassification: He criticizes the overclassification of UAP data, particularly in the UAP Security Classification Guide (SCG), which he has read.
• Call for Declassification: Ben advocates for revising and downgrading classification levels to release non-sensitive UAP evidence.
• Public Apathy: He notes public disinterest in UAP hearings, attributing it to short attention spans and distraction by daily life.
• Scientific Inquiry: Ben argues that UAP evidence should be declassified for scientific study, comparing suppression to historical cases like Galileo’s persecution.
• National Security Concerns: While acknowledging legitimate secrecy needs, Ben questions whether UAP concealment is necessary, as many incidents appear harmless.
• Close Encounters: He describes UAPs engaging in “cat and mouse” games with U.S. assets, like a Reaper drone, forcing evasive maneuvers.
• Global Phenomenon: UAP sightings are reported worldwide, including near nuclear facilities in geopolitically sensitive areas.
• Historical Sightings: Ben cites UAP activity during World War II (foo fighters), the 1952 Washington D.C. flyovers, and the 1997 Phoenix Lights.
• Nuclear Interest: UAPs frequently appear near nuclear assets, from Manhattan Project days to modern sites like Fukushima in 2011.
• Biological Effects: Ben confirms UAP-related biological effects on witnesses, as seen in cases like Bentwaters, supporting Lou Elizondo’s “six observables.”
• Technologies of Unknown Origin: He describes UAPs exhibiting propulsion systems unknown to human technology, ruling out state adversaries like Russia or China.
• Private Sector Involvement: Companies like Lockheed Martin, EG&G, and TRW have been involved in UAP-related efforts, often siloed from public knowledge.
• Intelligence Gaps: Ben, citing Chris Mellon, warns that UAP secrecy creates intelligence gaps, potentially compromising national defense.
• Skepticism and Evidence: He acknowledges healthy skepticism but insists the overwhelming evidence—videos, radar, sonar—cannot be dismissed.
• ET Hypothesis: Ben leans toward an extraterrestrial explanation, supported by isotopic analysis of recovered materials indicating non-Earth origins.
• Risks to Whistleblowers: He highlights credible threats, break-ins, and intimidation faced by whistleblowers, justifying his anonymity.
• Moral Duty: Ben feels compelled to speak out, refusing to withhold the truth for decades, inspired by whistleblowers like David Grusch.
• Public Right to Know: He argues that citizens have a constitutional right to know about UAPs, comparing secrecy to historical misinformation campaigns.
• Actionable Insight: Ben encourages skeptics to educate themselves through books, documentaries, or credible sources rather than dismissing the topic.
• Support for Institutions: He urges support for organizations like Skywatcher, the Sol Foundation, and the UAP Disclosure Fund to advance disclosure.
• Respectful Discourse: Ben and the interviewer advocate for civil, respectful debate to progress the UAP conversation.
• Ongoing Sightings: He mentions recent UAP videos from the past few months, indicating the phenomenon’s persistence.
• Constitutional Betrayal: Ben views UAP secrecy as a betrayal of constitutional values, accusing some program insiders of acting as “domestic enemies.”
• Reverse Engineering: He has knowledge of a legacy program’s name related to craft retrieval and reverse engineering but avoids sharing it due to lethal risks.
• Global Cooperation: Ben sees his interview as part of a U.S.-UK cooperative effort to address the global UAP issue.
• Cultural Adaptation: He believes humans can adapt to UAP disclosure, citing historical resilience to paradigm shifts.
• Religious Perspectives: Ben references the Catholic Church’s openness to extraterrestrial life, arguing that religious objections should not limit disclosure.
• Long-Term Effort: He describes disclosure as an “ultramarathon,” urging perseverance despite slow progress.
• Message to Fence-Sitters: Quoting Edmund Burke, Ben encourages those hesitant to come forward to act, emphasizing that inaction enables secrecy.
• Optimism for Disclosure: Ben believes disclosure is near, viewing his role as an honor and a critical step toward revealing the truth.
Main Arguments
• UAP Reality: UAPs are real, non-human in origin, and exhibit advanced technology, supported by high-definition video, radar, and witness testimony.
• Government Cover-Up: A decades-long concealment effort, driven by fear of societal disruption, overclassification, and Pentagon obstruction, denies the public and elected officials the truth.
• Need for Disclosure: Declassification of non-sensitive UAP evidence is essential for scientific progress, public awareness, and informed governance.
• Moral and Civic Duty: Whistleblowers like Ben are compelled to speak out to uphold constitutional values and counter secrecy, despite personal risks.
• Global and Historical Scope: UAP activity is a worldwide, persistent phenomenon with historical roots, often linked to nuclear sites, requiring international cooperation.
Actionable Insights
• For Skeptics: Engage with credible sources (books, documentaries, X platform discussions) to educate yourself rather than dismissing UAP claims outright.
• For Potential Whistleblowers: Come forward through legal channels (e.g., Congress) to share knowledge, doing so cautiously to protect yourself.
• For the Public: Support organizations like Skywatcher and the UAP Disclosure Fund to push for transparency.
• For Researchers/Podcasters: Build trust with insiders to amplify credible voices, fostering respectful discourse to advance the conversation.
• For Policymakers: Demand access to UAP data, revise overclassification policies, and investigate Pentagon stonewalling to ensure democratic oversight.
Crucial Statistics/Details
• 92 Years of Concealment: Ben references a UAP cover-up since at least 1933 (Magenta crash or earlier).
• 4K Video Evidence: High-definition UAP videos, including daytime and transmedium footage, exist on classified networks.
• Six Observables: Ben confirms UAP characteristics like silent operation, no visible propulsion, and biological effects, as outlined by Lou Elizondo.
• Recent Sightings: Videos from the last couple of months (prior to April 2025) indicate ongoing UAP activity.
• Congressional Stonewalling: Even Gang of Eight members are denied access to UAP data, highlighting systemic obstruction.
This summary captures the essence of Ben’s testimony, emphasizing the urgency of UAP disclosure, the challenges of secrecy, and the need for collective action to bring the truth to light.
• Whistleblower Identity: Ben, speaking anonymously for personal and family safety, is a former active-duty military member and contractor who worked with the U.S. government.
• Purpose of Speaking Out: Ben aims to support fellow whistleblowers like Lou Elizondo, David Grusch, and others, emphasizing the importance of their disclosures.
• UAP Exposure: Ben encountered UAP information both personally (through a sighting) and professionally while serving and as a contractor.
• Security Clearance: Ben held a security clearance, though he avoids specifying the level for operational and personal security reasons.
• Access to UAP Data: His clearance allowed access to systems containing UAP-related information, including videos and data.
• Incidental Involvement: Ben was not directly involved in UAP programs but came across information incidentally and networked with those connected to such programs.
• Personal Sighting: Ben witnessed a medium-sized, disc-shaped or oblate spheroid object, which he describes as silent with no visible wings or propulsion systems.
• Supporting Disclosure: Ben sees his role as part of a team effort to push for UAP disclosure, calling it the "biggest story of our time."
• Historical Context: He references UAP concealment efforts dating back to the Cold War and earlier, possibly 92 years (since 1933).
• Government Secrecy: Ben alleges a persistent government effort to hide UAP evidence, citing fears of anarchy, market shock, or religious upheaval.
• Video Evidence: Ben has seen high-definition (4K or better) UAP videos, including daytime footage and FLIR (Forward-Looking Infrared) recordings.
• Transmedium Capabilities: He describes UAPs operating seamlessly in air and water, beyond the capabilities of commercial drones.
• Orbs and Craft: Ben has seen videos of orbs emerging from water and clustering, as well as larger craft, suggesting non-human intelligence (NHI).
• Non-Threatening Nature: Ben does not view UAPs as a threat but as an ongoing intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operation, possibly for millennia.
• Classified Networks: He accessed UAP videos on classified networks months before their public release by the New York Times in December 2017.
• Validation of Evidence: Ben confirms the authenticity of New York Times UAP videos, noting the government’s lack of understanding of their origin.
• Networking: He has connected with researchers, witnesses, and individuals linked to UAP programs, including someone mentioned in Ross Coulthart’s book.
• Congressional Briefing: Ben has briefed members of Congress on UAP information, fulfilling what he sees as a civic duty.
• Pentagon Obstruction: He accuses the Pentagon of stonewalling Congress, even the Gang of Eight, on UAP matters, undermining democratic oversight.
• Legacy Programs: Ben references a legacy UAP program, alleging Sean Kirkpatrick, former AARO director, was involved despite legal mandates to remain independent.
• Overclassification: He criticizes the overclassification of UAP data, particularly in the UAP Security Classification Guide (SCG), which he has read.
• Call for Declassification: Ben advocates for revising and downgrading classification levels to release non-sensitive UAP evidence.
• Public Apathy: He notes public disinterest in UAP hearings, attributing it to short attention spans and distraction by daily life.
• Scientific Inquiry: Ben argues that UAP evidence should be declassified for scientific study, comparing suppression to historical cases like Galileo’s persecution.
• National Security Concerns: While acknowledging legitimate secrecy needs, Ben questions whether UAP concealment is necessary, as many incidents appear harmless.
• Close Encounters: He describes UAPs engaging in “cat and mouse” games with U.S. assets, like a Reaper drone, forcing evasive maneuvers.
• Global Phenomenon: UAP sightings are reported worldwide, including near nuclear facilities in geopolitically sensitive areas.
• Historical Sightings: Ben cites UAP activity during World War II (foo fighters), the 1952 Washington D.C. flyovers, and the 1997 Phoenix Lights.
• Nuclear Interest: UAPs frequently appear near nuclear assets, from Manhattan Project days to modern sites like Fukushima in 2011.
• Biological Effects: Ben confirms UAP-related biological effects on witnesses, as seen in cases like Bentwaters, supporting Lou Elizondo’s “six observables.”
• Technologies of Unknown Origin: He describes UAPs exhibiting propulsion systems unknown to human technology, ruling out state adversaries like Russia or China.
• Private Sector Involvement: Companies like Lockheed Martin, EG&G, and TRW have been involved in UAP-related efforts, often siloed from public knowledge.
• Intelligence Gaps: Ben, citing Chris Mellon, warns that UAP secrecy creates intelligence gaps, potentially compromising national defense.
• Skepticism and Evidence: He acknowledges healthy skepticism but insists the overwhelming evidence—videos, radar, sonar—cannot be dismissed.
• ET Hypothesis: Ben leans toward an extraterrestrial explanation, supported by isotopic analysis of recovered materials indicating non-Earth origins.
• Risks to Whistleblowers: He highlights credible threats, break-ins, and intimidation faced by whistleblowers, justifying his anonymity.
• Moral Duty: Ben feels compelled to speak out, refusing to withhold the truth for decades, inspired by whistleblowers like David Grusch.
• Public Right to Know: He argues that citizens have a constitutional right to know about UAPs, comparing secrecy to historical misinformation campaigns.
• Actionable Insight: Ben encourages skeptics to educate themselves through books, documentaries, or credible sources rather than dismissing the topic.
• Support for Institutions: He urges support for organizations like Skywatcher, the Sol Foundation, and the UAP Disclosure Fund to advance disclosure.
• Respectful Discourse: Ben and the interviewer advocate for civil, respectful debate to progress the UAP conversation.
• Ongoing Sightings: He mentions recent UAP videos from the past few months, indicating the phenomenon’s persistence.
• Constitutional Betrayal: Ben views UAP secrecy as a betrayal of constitutional values, accusing some program insiders of acting as “domestic enemies.”
• Reverse Engineering: He has knowledge of a legacy program’s name related to craft retrieval and reverse engineering but avoids sharing it due to lethal risks.
• Global Cooperation: Ben sees his interview as part of a U.S.-UK cooperative effort to address the global UAP issue.
• Cultural Adaptation: He believes humans can adapt to UAP disclosure, citing historical resilience to paradigm shifts.
• Religious Perspectives: Ben references the Catholic Church’s openness to extraterrestrial life, arguing that religious objections should not limit disclosure.
• Long-Term Effort: He describes disclosure as an “ultramarathon,” urging perseverance despite slow progress.
• Message to Fence-Sitters: Quoting Edmund Burke, Ben encourages those hesitant to come forward to act, emphasizing that inaction enables secrecy.
• Optimism for Disclosure: Ben believes disclosure is near, viewing his role as an honor and a critical step toward revealing the truth.
Main Arguments
• UAP Reality: UAPs are real, non-human in origin, and exhibit advanced technology, supported by high-definition video, radar, and witness testimony.
• Government Cover-Up: A decades-long concealment effort, driven by fear of societal disruption, overclassification, and Pentagon obstruction, denies the public and elected officials the truth.
• Need for Disclosure: Declassification of non-sensitive UAP evidence is essential for scientific progress, public awareness, and informed governance.
• Moral and Civic Duty: Whistleblowers like Ben are compelled to speak out to uphold constitutional values and counter secrecy, despite personal risks.
• Global and Historical Scope: UAP activity is a worldwide, persistent phenomenon with historical roots, often linked to nuclear sites, requiring international cooperation.
Actionable Insights
• For Skeptics: Engage with credible sources (books, documentaries, X platform discussions) to educate yourself rather than dismissing UAP claims outright.
• For Potential Whistleblowers: Come forward through legal channels (e.g., Congress) to share knowledge, doing so cautiously to protect yourself.
• For the Public: Support organizations like Skywatcher and the UAP Disclosure Fund to push for transparency.
• For Researchers/Podcasters: Build trust with insiders to amplify credible voices, fostering respectful discourse to advance the conversation.
• For Policymakers: Demand access to UAP data, revise overclassification policies, and investigate Pentagon stonewalling to ensure democratic oversight.
Crucial Statistics/Details
• 92 Years of Concealment: Ben references a UAP cover-up since at least 1933 (Magenta crash or earlier).
• 4K Video Evidence: High-definition UAP videos, including daytime and transmedium footage, exist on classified networks.
• Six Observables: Ben confirms UAP characteristics like silent operation, no visible propulsion, and biological effects, as outlined by Lou Elizondo.
• Recent Sightings: Videos from the last couple of months (prior to April 2025) indicate ongoing UAP activity.
• Congressional Stonewalling: Even Gang of Eight members are denied access to UAP data, highlighting systemic obstruction.
This summary captures the essence of Ben’s testimony, emphasizing the urgency of UAP disclosure, the challenges of secrecy, and the need for collective action to bring the truth to light.
