Source: Dialogue Works youtube
Scott Ritter | Hormuz Blocked! Iran’s Missile Fire Can Leave the US Navy DEFENSELESS | Feb. 18, 2026
Project Unity | I Found Evidence of LOST Advanced Civilisations In Peru! | Feb. 18, 2026
Labels
Ancient Civilisations,
peru
/
Source: Project Unity youtube
Description:
Powering megalithic structures, laser-precise cuts in stone, the signs of an ancient cataclysm, this 4K cinematic expedition through Peru’s Sacred Valley exposes the lost civilisation evidence that we are being told does not exist. Join me and Valley resident, researcher and author, Camille M. Sauvé, on this epic journey.
Description:
Powering megalithic structures, laser-precise cuts in stone, the signs of an ancient cataclysm, this 4K cinematic expedition through Peru’s Sacred Valley exposes the lost civilisation evidence that we are being told does not exist. Join me and Valley resident, researcher and author, Camille M. Sauvé, on this epic journey.
Larry C. Johnson | No Surprise if Russia Takes Kyiv | Feb. 18, 2026
Source: Daniel Davis youtube
Description:
Larry Johnson argues that there is deep division and strategic confusion on the European side of the Ukraine war. Despite what he sees as a lack of a viable military path for Ukraine — along with internal political fractures within the Zelensky government — European leaders, particularly in the UK, France, and Germany, continue pushing confrontation with Russia. He attributes this to longstanding hostility toward Russia, cultural and ideological differences, and competition over Russia’s natural resources.
He claims there is a growing disconnect between European political elites and their populations. Leaders like Friedrich Merz, Emmanuel Macron, and Keir Starmer are described as having weak domestic support while continuing hardline policies. Meanwhile, figures like Robert Fico and Viktor Orban are portrayed as advocating negotiation but facing pressure from the European Union.
On the Russian side, the discussion addresses claims of internal divisions within the Kremlin over how to handle negotiations with the U.S. Some reports suggest debate between those favoring a deal with Washington and those pushing for total military victory. However, the speaker dismisses claims by commentator John Helmer of serious Kremlin fractures, arguing instead that Russia remains unified.
The speaker emphasizes that Russian officials, including Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, believe the U.S. has failed to honor prior agreements (referencing talks in Anchorage). He argues that the U.S. has not lifted sanctions, unfrozen assets, or taken tangible steps toward normalization, and instead has increased sanctions — leading Russia to judge U.S. actions rather than rhetoric.
Regarding Russian strategy, the speaker contends that Russia is deliberately conducting a limited “special military operation,” not full mobilization. He argues that Russia is advancing steadily, inflicting heavy Ukrainian losses, and is not under pressure to escalate quickly. Claims that Russia is moving either too slowly or too quickly are dismissed as contradictory Western narratives.
Description:
Larry Johnson argues that there is deep division and strategic confusion on the European side of the Ukraine war. Despite what he sees as a lack of a viable military path for Ukraine — along with internal political fractures within the Zelensky government — European leaders, particularly in the UK, France, and Germany, continue pushing confrontation with Russia. He attributes this to longstanding hostility toward Russia, cultural and ideological differences, and competition over Russia’s natural resources.
He claims there is a growing disconnect between European political elites and their populations. Leaders like Friedrich Merz, Emmanuel Macron, and Keir Starmer are described as having weak domestic support while continuing hardline policies. Meanwhile, figures like Robert Fico and Viktor Orban are portrayed as advocating negotiation but facing pressure from the European Union.
On the Russian side, the discussion addresses claims of internal divisions within the Kremlin over how to handle negotiations with the U.S. Some reports suggest debate between those favoring a deal with Washington and those pushing for total military victory. However, the speaker dismisses claims by commentator John Helmer of serious Kremlin fractures, arguing instead that Russia remains unified.
The speaker emphasizes that Russian officials, including Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, believe the U.S. has failed to honor prior agreements (referencing talks in Anchorage). He argues that the U.S. has not lifted sanctions, unfrozen assets, or taken tangible steps toward normalization, and instead has increased sanctions — leading Russia to judge U.S. actions rather than rhetoric.
Regarding Russian strategy, the speaker contends that Russia is deliberately conducting a limited “special military operation,” not full mobilization. He argues that Russia is advancing steadily, inflicting heavy Ukrainian losses, and is not under pressure to escalate quickly. Claims that Russia is moving either too slowly or too quickly are dismissed as contradictory Western narratives.
Matthew Hoh | This Is How Every Empire Destroys Itself | Feb. 18, 2026
Labels
China,
Iran,
Matthew Hoh,
Russia,
Trump
/
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs | The Strategic Risks of Fighting Iran | Feb. 18, 2026
Labels
China,
Iran,
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs,
Russia,
Trump
/
The Corbett Report | Can This Device Help Us Escape Energy Poverty? | Feb. 19, 2026
Source: corbettreport.com
Description:
Did somebody say "small modular, molten fuel salt, thorium fuel cycle, thermal spectrum, breeder reactors"? Well, guess what? Somebody said it. And maybe it's happening soon! So, what does that mean? Good question! Today on Solutions Watch, James talks to Thomas Pedersen of Copenhagen Atomics about their next gen small modular reactors and how independent communities of the future will be powered.
Show Notes:
China to build a molten salt nuclear reactor on the edge of the Gobi Desert | ABC News
Thorium Revolution: Can China’s New Molten Salt Reactor Transform Nuclear Energy?
China’s World-First Thorium Reactor That Never Shuts Down
China Unveils the World’s First Thorium-Powered Cargo Ship, Carry up to 14,000 Shipping Containers
The Thorium Solution – #SolutionsWatch
Copenhagen Atomics
https://thoriumsmr.com/
Nuclear In Your Backyard? Tiny Reactors Could One Day Power Towns And Campuses
3 Microreactor Experiments to Watch Starting in 2026
US conducts first air transport of nuclear microreactor in bid to show technology’s viability
Bill Gates strikes major partnership to build next-gen nuclear reactor: ‘A global nuclear supply’
The Inconvenient Truth About Small Modular Reactors? – Nuclear Engineer Reacts to Dr. Ben Miles
Description:
Did somebody say "small modular, molten fuel salt, thorium fuel cycle, thermal spectrum, breeder reactors"? Well, guess what? Somebody said it. And maybe it's happening soon! So, what does that mean? Good question! Today on Solutions Watch, James talks to Thomas Pedersen of Copenhagen Atomics about their next gen small modular reactors and how independent communities of the future will be powered.
Show Notes:
China to build a molten salt nuclear reactor on the edge of the Gobi Desert | ABC News
Thorium Revolution: Can China’s New Molten Salt Reactor Transform Nuclear Energy?
China’s World-First Thorium Reactor That Never Shuts Down
China Unveils the World’s First Thorium-Powered Cargo Ship, Carry up to 14,000 Shipping Containers
The Thorium Solution – #SolutionsWatch
Copenhagen Atomics
https://thoriumsmr.com/
Nuclear In Your Backyard? Tiny Reactors Could One Day Power Towns And Campuses
3 Microreactor Experiments to Watch Starting in 2026
US conducts first air transport of nuclear microreactor in bid to show technology’s viability
Bill Gates strikes major partnership to build next-gen nuclear reactor: ‘A global nuclear supply’
The Inconvenient Truth About Small Modular Reactors? – Nuclear Engineer Reacts to Dr. Ben Miles
John Helmer | Attempts to Russiagate the Epstein Files | Feb. 18, 2026
Labels
China,
Iran,
Jeffrey Epstein,
John Helmer,
NATO,
Russia,
Trump,
Ukraine
/
Source: Glenn Diesen youtube
Description:
John Helmer is one of the longest-serving Western journalists in Moscow. Helmer discusses the significance of the Epstein files, the attempts to Russiagate the scandal, and the political divisions that have grown in Moscow.
Description:
John Helmer is one of the longest-serving Western journalists in Moscow. Helmer discusses the significance of the Epstein files, the attempts to Russiagate the scandal, and the political divisions that have grown in Moscow.
Col. Douglas Macgregor | BOMBING IRAN Won't Fix Anything | Feb. 17, 2026
Labels
China,
Colonel Douglas Macgregor,
Iran,
Israel,
Lt Col Daniel Davis,
Russia,
Trump,
Ukraine
/
Source: Daniel Davis youtube
Description:
U.S. military leaders are confident in their capabilities against Iran, but any war would likely involve American losses in the air, on the ground, and possibly at sea.
Senator Lindsey Graham is portrayed as accepting those risks, arguing military action is justified despite potential U.S. casualties. The speaker strongly disagrees, arguing there is no compelling U.S. national security reason to attack Iran and that such a war would provoke Iranian retaliation and American deaths.
Col Douglas Macgregor claims some policymakers and commentators view U.S. and Israeli interests as identical, but argues the U.S. has no strategic interest in destroying Iran or its society.
He rejects the idea that Iranians would welcome U.S. military intervention, arguing bombing Iran would not help its population or lead to regime change.
The speaker disputes claims that Iran poses a global threat or is actively pursuing nuclear weapons, arguing Iran’s actions are primarily defensive or regional rather than aimed at world domination.
He criticizes Western media and neoconservative voices, including Mark Thiessen, for promoting war and framing negotiations as requiring Iran’s surrender.
He argues negotiations are unlikely to succeed because U.S. demands—such as ending enrichment, missile programs, and regional influence—are unacceptable to Iran.
He concludes that U.S. policy toward Iran is heavily influenced by Israeli strategic priorities and broader geopolitical and financial power struggles, making compromise unlikely and increasing the risk of conflict.
Overall: The speaker argues that war with Iran would be costly, unnecessary for U.S. security, unlikely to achieve its goals, and driven more by ideology and alliances than by clear American interests.
Description:
U.S. military leaders are confident in their capabilities against Iran, but any war would likely involve American losses in the air, on the ground, and possibly at sea.
Senator Lindsey Graham is portrayed as accepting those risks, arguing military action is justified despite potential U.S. casualties. The speaker strongly disagrees, arguing there is no compelling U.S. national security reason to attack Iran and that such a war would provoke Iranian retaliation and American deaths.
Col Douglas Macgregor claims some policymakers and commentators view U.S. and Israeli interests as identical, but argues the U.S. has no strategic interest in destroying Iran or its society.
He rejects the idea that Iranians would welcome U.S. military intervention, arguing bombing Iran would not help its population or lead to regime change.
The speaker disputes claims that Iran poses a global threat or is actively pursuing nuclear weapons, arguing Iran’s actions are primarily defensive or regional rather than aimed at world domination.
He criticizes Western media and neoconservative voices, including Mark Thiessen, for promoting war and framing negotiations as requiring Iran’s surrender.
He argues negotiations are unlikely to succeed because U.S. demands—such as ending enrichment, missile programs, and regional influence—are unacceptable to Iran.
He concludes that U.S. policy toward Iran is heavily influenced by Israeli strategic priorities and broader geopolitical and financial power struggles, making compromise unlikely and increasing the risk of conflict.
Overall: The speaker argues that war with Iran would be costly, unnecessary for U.S. security, unlikely to achieve its goals, and driven more by ideology and alliances than by clear American interests.
Andrei Martyanov | Soap Opera | Feb. 17, 2026
Labels
Andrei Martyanov,
NATO,
Russia,
Ukraine
/
Source: smoothiex12.blogspot.com
Description:
Patrushev explains, Russian Navy grows. Soap Opera "Peace Deal".
Patrushev explains, Russian Navy grows. Soap Opera "Peace Deal".
